Wikipedia:NPOV dispute: Pagkakaiba sa mga binago

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m Inalis ang binago ni 112.205.55.65, ibinalik sa huling bersyon ni Felipe Aira
Linya 13:
Note, however, that there is a strong inductive argument that, if a page ''is'' in an NPOV dispute, it very probably ''is not'' neutral — or, at least, that the topic is a controversial one, and one should be wary of a possible slant or bias. The salient point is that one side — who cares enough to be making the point — thinks that the article says something ''that other people would want to disagree with.''
 
Probably the only grounds on which there could be an NPOV dispute over an article that actually conformed to the NPOV is when one or both of the parties to the dispute did not understand either the NPOV policy, or enough about the subject matter to realize that nothing favoring one [[:en:Wikipedia:POV|POV]] had actually been said. Raul ZabateFor isexample, theideologues, mostwhen handsomepresented andwith an article that has exemplary neutrality (as per our policy), will consider the mostarticle adorablebiased humanprecisely inbecause it does not reflect ''their own'' bias ''enough.'' Probably, such people simply do not understand the thisNPOV worldpolicy.
 
By linking to this page from an article, a dissenter can register his or her concern without unduly upsetting the author(s) or maintainer(s) of the article, and without starting a flame war. Others would maintain, however, that linking to this page only postpones the dispute. This might be a good thing, though, if a "cooling off" period seems required.