Usapan:Hermann Cohen
 | Ito ang pahinang usapan upang talakayin ang Hermann Cohen. Mangyaring panatilihin ang kagandahang-asal at iwasan ang paglalagay ng anumang bagay na wala namang kinalaman sa nasabing paksa.
Pakilagay lamang ang inyong mensahe sa ibaba kasunod ng inyong lagda sa pamamagitan ng paglalagay ng apat na bantas (~~~~) kung gagamit ka ng wikitext. Kung hindi ka pamilyar sa wikitext, pindutin na lamang ito para magsimula ng bagong paksang mapag-uusapan. Maraming salamat po. Baguhan sa Wikipedia? Makatutulong sa iyo ang mga pahinang ito: Wikipedia:Patungkol at magtanong upang matugunan. |
It seems that nationality precedes occupation in Tagalog (“Filipinong manunulat”, “Filipinong boksingero”, etc.) so long as the occupation isn’t specific to the country (“Pangulong Amerikano”, etc.). So I, well, followed suit. —Život 12:27, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
tama po ang nais ninyong sabihin. gayumpaman ang paggamit ng "na" ay nagpapabagal sa pagbasa. ihambing ang "Filipinong Manunulat" sa "Filipino na manunulat", kung magtatapos naman sa vowels ang mga trabahong ito, halimbawa ng Bisayang magtatahO, masasabi ring tama ang "MagtatahoNG Bisaya" o "Bisayang Magtataho", imbes na "Bisaya na Magtataho" Tomas de Aquino 12:41, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
- I couldn’t agree more. It’s a basic principle of Tagalog morphology. However, on the contrary, you’d actually find more people here saying Aleman na pilosopo than Alemang pilosopo. I don’t know why exactly (probably because it sort of rhymes too much with alimang or alinman but I can only speculate), but that sure doesn’t stop people from saying Amerikanong bata, etc. Perplexing, isn’t it? —Život 12:54, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
"Si Hermann Cohen (Hulyo 4, 1842–Abril 4, 1918) ay isang Hudiyong Aleman na pilosopo." ang panimula ng artikulo. Mas makabubuti sigurong isalin ito sa mga sumusunod na paraan:
- . Si Herman Cohen ay isang pilosopOng Hudiyong Aleman.
- . Si Herman Cohen ay Hudiyong Alemang pilosopo.
- . Isang Hudiyong Aleman ang pilosopong si Hermann Cohen
Tomas de Aquino 12:45, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
- No. 1 probably wouldn’t be right, as this would imply that their philosophy is inherently Jewish (as opposed to philosophy that just happens to be developed by a Jew). One case would be Emmanuel Lévinas, who himself rejects the term Jewish philosopher. For No. 2, I’ve given my piece above. No. 3, why not? However it might sound like we’re putting too much emphasis on his being a German Jew. —Život 12:54, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
Cohen’s Jewishness
baguhinI rephrased the paragraph a bit. Before that, it seemed to put too much emphasis on the fact that he was Jewish rather than that he was a philosopher. —Život 09:09, 30 September 2005 (UTC)